Most & Least Expensive US Cities to Live In (2026)
FAHAQ Study · Updated 2026-07-19 · 2026 data
US cities ranked by overall cost-of-living index (US urban average = 100) — from New York City at the top to the affordable Midwest and South.
Cost of living compresses housing, groceries, utilities, transport and healthcare into one number, with the US urban average set at 100. We ranked major US cities by that composite index. New York City, NY tops the list at 187, roughly 87% above the national average, while Cleveland, OH is the most affordable at 82.
| # | City | Cost index | vs US average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York City, NY | 187 | +87% vs US avg |
| 2 | Honolulu, HI | 186 | +86% vs US avg |
| 3 | San Francisco, CA | 179 | +79% vs US avg |
| 4 | San Jose, CA | 176 | +76% vs US avg |
| 5 | Seattle, WA | 154 | +54% vs US avg |
| 6 | Washington, DC | 152 | +52% vs US avg |
| 7 | Boston, MA | 150 | +50% vs US avg |
| 8 | Los Angeles, CA | 148 | +48% vs US avg |
| 9 | Oakland, CA | 143 | +43% vs US avg |
| 10 | San Diego, CA | 143 | +43% vs US avg |
| 11 | Portland, OR | 130 | +30% vs US avg |
| 12 | Anchorage, AK | 122 | +22% vs US avg |
| 13 | Miami, FL | 122 | +22% vs US avg |
| 14 | Hartford, CT | 122 | +22% vs US avg |
| 15 | Newark, NJ | 120 | +20% vs US avg |
| 16 | Providence, RI | 118 | +18% vs US avg |
| 17 | Portland, ME | 116 | +16% vs US avg |
| 18 | Sacramento, CA | 115 | +15% vs US avg |
| 19 | Denver, CO | 112 | +12% vs US avg |
| 20 | Baltimore, MD | 110 | +10% vs US avg |
| 21 | Ann Arbor, MI | 110 | +10% vs US avg |
| 22 | Reno, NV | 109 | +9% vs US avg |
| 23 | Eugene, OR | 108 | +8% vs US avg |
| 24 | Phoenix, AZ | 108 | +8% vs US avg |
| 25 | Salt Lake City, UT | 108 | +8% vs US avg |
| 26 | Charleston, SC | 108 | +8% vs US avg |
| 27 | Atlanta, GA | 107 | +7% vs US avg |
| 28 | Fort Collins, CO | 106 | +6% vs US avg |
| 29 | Las Vegas, NV | 106 | +6% vs US avg |
| 30 | Chicago, IL | 106 | +6% vs US avg |
| 31 | Minneapolis, MN | 106 | +6% vs US avg |
| 32 | Colorado Springs, CO | 104 | +4% vs US avg |
| 33 | Boise, ID | 104 | +4% vs US avg |
| 34 | Orlando, FL | 104 | +4% vs US avg |
| 35 | Madison, WI | 104 | +4% vs US avg |
| 36 | Philadelphia, PA | 104 | +4% vs US avg |
| 37 | Nashville, TN | 103 | +3% vs US avg |
| 38 | Dallas, TX | 102 | +2% vs US avg |
| 39 | Tampa, FL | 102 | +2% vs US avg |
| 40 | Fresno, CA | 101 | +1% vs US avg |
| 41 | Austin, TX | 101 | +1% vs US avg |
| 42 | Richmond, VA | 100 | +0% vs US avg |
| 43 | Virginia Beach, VA | 100 | +0% vs US avg |
| 44 | Charlotte, NC | 99 | −1% vs US avg |
| 45 | Raleigh, NC | 99 | −1% vs US avg |
| 46 | Spokane, WA | 98 | −2% vs US avg |
| 47 | Fort Worth, TX | 98 | −2% vs US avg |
| 48 | Tucson, AZ | 96 | −4% vs US avg |
| 49 | Houston, TX | 96 | −4% vs US avg |
| 50 | New Orleans, LA | 96 | −4% vs US avg |
| 51 | Jacksonville, FL | 96 | −4% vs US avg |
| 52 | Milwaukee, WI | 95 | −5% vs US avg |
| 53 | Albuquerque, NM | 94 | −6% vs US avg |
| 54 | Savannah, GA | 94 | −6% vs US avg |
| 55 | San Antonio, TX | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 56 | Baton Rouge, LA | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 57 | Columbia, SC | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 58 | Des Moines, IA | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 59 | Pittsburgh, PA | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 60 | Buffalo, NY | 92 | −8% vs US avg |
| 61 | Louisville, KY | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 62 | Indianapolis, IN | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 63 | Columbus, OH | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 64 | Kansas City, MO | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 65 | Omaha, NE | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 66 | Rochester, NY | 90 | −10% vs US avg |
| 67 | Knoxville, TN | 89 | −11% vs US avg |
| 68 | El Paso, TX | 88 | −12% vs US avg |
| 69 | Little Rock, AR | 88 | −12% vs US avg |
| 70 | Cincinnati, OH | 88 | −12% vs US avg |
| 71 | Detroit, MI | 88 | −12% vs US avg |
| 72 | St. Louis, MO | 87 | −13% vs US avg |
| 73 | Memphis, TN | 86 | −14% vs US avg |
| 74 | Oklahoma City, OK | 84 | −16% vs US avg |
| 75 | Wichita, KS | 83 | −17% vs US avg |
| 76 | Tulsa, OK | 82 | −18% vs US avg |
| 77 | Cleveland, OH | 82 | −18% vs US avg |
Each row links to that city’s full FAHAQ calculator. Figures are for 2026.
Methodology
Each city's composite cost-of-living index uses the C2ER / ACCRA convention where the US urban average = 100 — a city at 130 is about 30% more expensive than average. Composite figures are anchored to recognized C2ER-style quarterly data and cross-checked against Numbeo's US city rankings (rebased to US-avg = 100), weighing housing, groceries, utilities, transportation and healthcare. Cost-of-living indices are inherently approximate and vary by source and quarter; we prioritize one consistent scale across all cities over false precision. Cities are ranked descending, most expensive first.
Sources
Frequently asked questions
What is the most expensive US city to live in?
New York City, NY is the most expensive major US city in this index at 187 — about 87% above the national average — driven mainly by housing. Honolulu, San Francisco and San Jose follow closely.
How does the cost-of-living index work?
The US urban average is set to 100. A city's index tells you how its overall costs compare: 120 means about 20% more expensive than average, 85 means about 15% cheaper. It blends housing, groceries, utilities, transportation and healthcare, with housing weighted most heavily.
Which US cities are the most affordable?
The cheapest cities in this ranking cluster in the Midwest and South — places like Cleveland, OH, Tulsa, Wichita and Cleveland — where housing sits well below the national average.
Are cost-of-living indices exact?
No. They are comparative estimates that differ by source and quarter, and real costs vary by neighborhood, household and lifestyle. Use the index to compare cities, not as a precise budget.